Queensland's budget estimates process entered its second day on Tuesday, with Premier David Crisafulli and Treasurer David Janetzki both scheduled to face intensive questioning from government and opposition MPs across a 9.5-hour session — and fresh revelations about the rising cost of politicians staying overnight at parliament have immediately set the tone.

The day's proceedings were structured in two blocks: a two-hour examination of the Premier's portfolio areas, including his role as minister for veterans, running until a lunch break at 1.15pm, followed by a five-hour afternoon session covering Treasurer Janetzki's responsibilities across treasury, home ownership and energy, from 2pm through to 7pm.

$35,000 Taxpayer Bill for Parliamentary Accommodation

The day's most striking figures emerged from hearings into parliamentary administration, revealing a dramatic surge in the use of overnight accommodation at the parliamentary annexe. A total of 191 overnight stays were reported in the last financial year — a near-fivefold increase compared to just 39 stays recorded the year before.

That spike translated directly into a much higher fringe benefits tax bill for Queensland taxpayers. While stays in the previous year triggered a tax liability of just over $7,000, last financial year's total climbed to almost $35,000. Members of Parliament are permitted to use the parliamentary annexe accommodation for personal purposes, but those stays attract fringe benefits tax obligations.

The number of MPs reporting overnight stays also rose sharply — from 13 members in the 2024–25 financial year to 33 members in the most recent period. Among those, one MP recorded 36 separate stays, with the next highest reporting 20. The identities of those members were not disclosed, with the parliamentary speaker citing personal privacy as the reason for keeping the information confidential.

Labor opposition MPs pressed parliamentary speaker Pat Weir to release a breakdown of the stays by political party. He declined.

"I would be very reluctant to do that," Weir told the estimates hearing. "We have had instances where we have had members that have significant challenges in their lives that have stayed at this parliament. I have no intention to go any further than where we are."

Clerk of the Parliament Neil Laurie supported the speaker's position, cautioning against drawing conclusions from a single year's figures.

"I would say you don't look at a year in isolation. You look at a year in the context of a longer period of time, like 10 years," Laurie said. He also pushed back against the idea of categorising members along party lines, saying: "I just don't want to go there, and I don't think anyone should."

Parliamentary Dining Room Costs Add Another $56,000

Separate to the accommodation figures, estimates hearings also revealed that the parliamentary dining room's operating hours had been extended beyond sitting weeks under the current LNP government — a change that cost taxpayers approximately $56,000 last financial year.

Laurie explained that the decision was driven largely by the fact that the current government has a significantly larger proportion of regional ministers who spend time in Brisbane even when parliament is not sitting. He described the extended hours as "primarily motivated" by that factor, noting there was a "much, much larger component" of regional ministers compared to previous arrangements.

Background: Tim Mander and the Annexe Controversy

The scrutiny of parliamentary accommodation is not new ground. Questions about the use of the annexe were raised during last year's budget estimates, when Labor MPs asked how many personal overnight stays had been made by both Premier Crisafulli and Olympics Minister Tim Mander.

The issue intensified earlier this year when reports emerged that Mander had been living in parliamentary accommodation following a personal separation, and that he had been enrolled to vote at the address of a staffer. The matter was referred to the Australian Federal Police. Mander was stood down from his sport and Olympic portfolios pending the outcome of that investigation, but was cleared of any wrongdoing and reinstated as minister last week.

The episode drew renewed attention to the rules governing parliamentary accommodation use and the transparency — or lack thereof — around how those entitlements are exercised. Tuesday's estimates session reinforced that the issue remains live, with the opposition pressing for greater disclosure of how the annexe is being used and by whom.

What's Next in the Nine-Day Estimates Block

Tuesday marks day two of a scheduled nine-day estimates process — a fixture of Queensland's parliamentary calendar that allows detailed scrutiny of government spending and portfolio performance. The first day focused on the parliamentary service itself, with Tuesday's session turning the spotlight onto the state's most senior ministers.

The Queensland government's infrastructure and spending commitments are expected to face close examination as the estimates hearings continue over the coming days, with remaining ministerial portfolios yet to be scheduled for scrutiny.

For Crisafulli and Janetzki, Tuesday's appearances represent the most high-profile moments of the estimates cycle, as the two most senior figures in the government face questions ranging from budget priorities to ministerial conduct. Public servants from across their portfolio areas were also present to assist with technical and administrative questions during the hearings.